At Core Catalysts, we are regularly asked to assist department decision makers and procurement professionals with an RFP (meaning “request for proposal”) to support their purchasing decisions.
We provide management consulting for our nationwide list of clients in critical industries, including insurance, healthcare, financial services, and telecommunications. Throughout our daily conversations with business leaders, we’ve observed most organizations need a strategic RFP approach that cultivates exceptional talent and services from highly qualified candidates.
This article covers:
The purpose of an RFP is to communicate available funding for a project or program and to solicit bids for its implementation. This approach makes the process competitive and fair, and ultimately ensures receipt of a higher number of proposals. The organization that develops the RFP then evaluates the proposal submissions and determines the best candidates.
Each stage of the RFP process is an opportunity to encourage excellence from the bids you solicit. When an organization strives for strong communication and effort, they are far more likely to gather bids that meet their standards.
Core Catalysts has identified this structure to generate dynamic bids and exceptional results from prospective partners:
It is also critical to note that the RFP process is iterative; after project implementation, set aside time for evaluation of the entire process and make changes where applicable. When a new project or initiative arises, the previously discussed improvements should be implemented.
If you’d like further help constructing an RFP or need help managing the RFP process, contact our consulting management team.
There are many refinements you can make to your RFP to solicit the results you’re looking for. The recommendations we’ve listed below also make the process more equitable by prompting responses that can be measured without subjective bias.
You can also consider the following rating system to determine weights:
1 – Not important
2 – Less important
3 – Neutral
4 – Important
5 – Very important
Before you meet as a committee to evaluate RFP submissions, creating an evaluative rubric for scoring answers allows you to ensure a far more objective and efficient process.
For closed-ended questions that require a yes or no answer to determine the vendor’s qualifications, apply the following score:
1 – Yes
0 – No
For open-ended questions, apply one of the following scores:
1 – Poor answer
2 – Fair answer
3 – Average answer
Use or adapt the following resources to enhance the RFP process. These resources are courtesy of Core Catalysts, a Kansas City-based management consulting firm that works with nationwide clients across a range of critical industries.
This table of contents provides a template for an RFP’s main structure, although revisions and additions can always be made based on your organization’s needs.
1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………….. P.1-#
1.1 Company Profile………………………………………………….x
1.1A Description…………………………………………………y
1.1B Products and services…………………………………..y
1.1C Location and geographic area……………………….y
1.1D Organizational chart and employee count……..y
1.2 Department Responsible for RFP…………………………..x
1.3 Background and Business Case……………………………..x
1.4 Current Applications and IT Infrastructure…………….x
1.5 Project Summary and Scope………………………………….x
1.6 Objective of RFP…………………………………………………..x
2. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSED VENDORS……………. P.2-#
2.1 Schedule of Major Events and Deadlines (see example in Table 1 below)…..x
2.2 Communication and Inquiries……………………………….x
2.3 Preparation Expenses (Responsibility of Vendor)……x
2.4 Preparation Instructions……………………………………….x
3. VENDOR GENERAL INFORMATION……………………………………………… P.3-#
3.1 Vendor Profile………………………………………………………x
4. FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS………………………… P.4-#
4.1 Detailed Description on Systems Needed…………………x
4.2 Current Statistics and Data…………………………………….x
4.2A 6-12-month volume, spend, count, usage of needed services or products…..y
5. TECHNICAL QUESTIONS TO BE COMPLETED BY VENDOR…..P.5-#
5.1 Closed-ended questions……………………………………………x
5.2 Open-ended questions……………………………………………..x
6. PRICING………………………………………………….. P.6-#
6.1 Pricing schedule instructions…………………………………….x
7. CUSTOMER CONTACTS………………………………….. P.7-#
7.1 Vendor Communications Table (see example in Table 2)…..x
8. APPENDICES……………………………………………. P.8-#
8.1 Appendix A. Term Glossary……………………………………….x
8.2 Appendix B. Suggested Contractual Terms and Agreement…..x
Note: Specify a time zone either under each date in the table, or if the time is the same for all deadlines, indicate the time (also referred to as a timetable or calendar of events) and time zone above the table. For example: “All submissions no later than 11:59 pm Central Time Zone on date specified.”
Task | Date |
Initial issuance of RFP by Company | [XX/XX/XX] |
Deadline for Vendors to submit questions to content of RFP | [XX/XX/XX] |
Answers for all relevant questions posted by Company | [XX/XX/XX] |
Deadline for submission of proposals by Vendors | [XX/XX/XX] |
Initial evaluation complete. Vendors will be notified of selected finalists (first round) | [XX/XX/XX] |
Vendor presentations scheduled with Company | [XX/XX/XX] |
Company selects final Vendor for recommendation to the Board of Directors/Executive Team | [XX/XX/XX] |
Contract awarded to Vendor | [XX/XX/XX] |
Preferred commencement date of project implementation | [XX/XX/XX] |
(Note: If submitting with a partnered organization, please add communication information for the partner as well)
Form B | Information |
Primary Contact | First Name Last Name |
person@companyxyz.com | |
Phone | (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
Address | Address, City, State, Zip |
Description of services provided in Scope | X Services; Y Services |
Form A | Information |
Primary Contact | First Name Last Name |
person@companyxyz.com | |
Phone | (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
Address | Address, City, State, Zip |
Description of services provided in Scope | X Services; Y Services |
Categories | Weight | Final Score | Initial Score | Final Score | Initial Score | Final Score | Initial Score |
Firm | 5% | 0.2 | 4 | 0.25 | 5 | 0.2 | 4 |
People | 10% | 0.3 | 3 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.4 | 4 |
Philosophy | 5% | 0.1 | 0.15 | 3 | 0.15 | 3 | |
Process | 10% | 0.5 | 5 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.3 | 3 |
Portfolio | 5% | 0.2 | 4 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.25 | 5 |
Fees | 15% | 0.6 | 4 | 0.6 | 4 | 0.75 | 5 |
Performance | 30% | 0.9 | 3 | 1.5 | 5 | 1.5 | 5 |
Systems | 20% | 0.6 | 3 | 0.8 | 4 | 0.8 | 4 |
Other | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Weighted Total | 100% | 3.4 | 4.1 | 4.35 |
Core Catalysts is a management consulting firm based in Kansas City. A results-oriented team, we benefit clients across the U.S. in many industries, including healthcare, insurance, financial services, and telecommunications. Core Catalysts provides services such as process improvement, product and service commercialization, revenue enhancement, financial modeling, program and project management, software selection, enterprise risk management, and business performance improvement.
Jim Wadella
Managing Member
Jim.Wadella@corecatalysts.com
Matt Craig
Senior Director
Matt.Craig@corecatalysts.com
Jeffrey Kupper
Senior Director
Jeffrey.Kupper@corecatalysts.com
This resource is for informational purposes only. Core Catalysts, LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information, and the information does not constitute accounting, financial, investment, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor are we suggesting the information replace such professional advice. Before making an important business decision, please consult a qualified professional.
“A Guide to Writing a Request for Proposal: How to let providers propose creative, relevant, and cost-effective solutions by focusing on the end, not the means.” Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), n.d. Retrieved 16 May 2024 from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.intix.org/resource/resmgr/files/shopping_for_a_new_system.pdf
Andriyanets, Yulia. “Request for Proposal (RFP) – In the area of computer hardware/software/services.” LinkedIn SlideShare, 31 May 2010. Retrieved 6 July 2016 from http://www.slideshare.net/Mike97/request-for-proposal-rfp-in-the-area-of-computer-hardware?qid=a408d996-243f-42a8-8cf9-dfc46b8ec163&v=&b=&from_search=2
Core Catalysts, LLC. miscellaneous proprietary documentation and methodologies. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
Heeringen, Harold van. “Request for Proposal (RFP) Management – Ask the right questions and choose wisely.” LinkedIn SlideShare, June 2010.
Huening, Nathan. “How to Write a Great Website RFP – with a little guidance, you’ll be writing them like a pro.” New Media Campaigns, 16 Dec. 2014.
Investopedia.com. “Request for Proposal – RFP.” Investopedia, 10 Jan. 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2016 from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/request-for-proposal.asp
Kutcher, David. “How to write Requests for Proposals (RFP) for best results.” Confluent Forms LLC., 19 June 2009. Retrieved 6 July 2016 from http://www.confluentforms.com/2009/06/6-steps-to-writing-better-request-for.html
Mike97. “Corporate Email Archive Solution – Sample Request for Proposal.” LinkedIn SlideShare, 1 Jan. 2009.
“Request for proposal.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 21 Oct. 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_proposal
Rouse, Margaret. “What is a request for proposal (RFP)? – definition from WhatIs.com.” Contributors: John Moore. SearchITChannel, Apr. 2015. Retrieved 6 July 2016 from http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/definition/request-for-proposal
TechSoup. “RFP Library – Tips and sample RFPs for your nonprofit, charity, or library.” TechSoup, 2 Feb. 2012. Retrieved 6 July 2016 from http://www.techsoup.org/support/articles-and-how-tos/rfp-library