Tag Archive: ERP

  1. ERP Customization: Achieving the Right Balance

    Leave a Comment

    Balancing Flexibility, Cost, and Strategic Value in Enterprise Resource Planning

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms form the technological backbone of modern organizations, integrating core business processes across finance, operations, human resources, supply chain, and more. When implementing an ERP solution, organizations face a critical decision: should they adopt the system “out of the box” (OOTB), leveraging standard features and workflows, or invest in customizing the platform to better fit their unique needs?

    This decision carries lasting implications for operational efficiency, growth, agility, and total cost of ownership. Below, we examine the advantages and disadvantages of ERP customization, the benefits and drawbacks of sticking to out-of-the-box solutions, and provide guidance on how organizations can determine the right approach for their situation.

    Understanding ERP Customization

    For the purposes of this discussion, we’ll define ERP customization as any modification made to the platform’s core code or structure to meet the unique requirements of an organization. These customizations can encompasses a spectrum of modifications, each varying in complexity and impact. At the simplest end, customization may involve cosmetic changes, such as adjusting the appearance of dashboards, personalizing user interfaces, or creating tailored reports and forms that present data in formats best suited to stakeholders’ needs. These changes typically do not affect the underlying business logic and are often reversible or easily updated.

    Moving beyond surface-level adjustments, organizations may choose to modify core processes and workflows within the ERP. This could include altering approval hierarchies, automating specific sequences of tasks, or embedding unique business rules that reflect company policies or regulatory requirements. Such modifications can enhance operational efficiency and ensure the system aligns more closely with established practices.

    For businesses with highly specialized needs, deeper customization might involve integrating the ERP with external applications, legacy systems, or third-party platforms. This often requires developing custom connectors, APIs, or middleware to facilitate smooth data exchange and real-time communication between disparate solutions.

    At the most advanced level, organizations may develop entirely new modules or functionalities within the platform, extending the platform’s native capabilities. This can include building tools for industry-specific reporting, adding support for unique product offerings, or introducing specialized workflows not available in the standard system. While these enhancements can provide a significant competitive advantage and drive innovation, they also demand robust technical expertise, thorough documentation, and ongoing support to ensure long-term maintainability and compatibility with future software updates.

    In short, customization ranges from surface-level interface tweaks to comprehensive system overhauls, all aimed at ensuring the platform delivers maximum value by fitting seamlessly into the organization’s unique operational fabric.

    Out-of-the-Box

    Unlike customized solutions, OOTB ERP implementations involve deploying the software with its default suite of features, built-in workflows, and pre-configured settings as designed by the vendor. Organizations adopting this approach typically make only superficial adjustments, such as minor branding or preference changes, while the core logic and structure of the ERP remain untouched. This strategy relies heavily on industry-standard practices and processes embedded in the software, encouraging organizations to adapt their internal operations to align with the ERP’s established framework. The OOTB route can significantly accelerate deployment timelines, reduce up-front implementation costs, and simplify future software upgrades and maintenance since custom code is either minimized or altogether absent. However, it may also require organizations to rethink existing business processes or compromise on specialized requirements in favor of broader standardization.

    Advantages of Customizing an ERP Platform

    While out-of-the-box ERP solutions offer a streamlined and cost-effective path to implementation, they often fall short of accommodating the intricate or evolving needs that set organizations apart. In contrast, customizing an ERP platform unlocks a wealth of strategic benefits, transforming the software from a generic toolkit into a finely tuned engine for operational excellence. By tailoring the system to mirror an organization’s unique processes, goals, and structure, customization empowers businesses to realize greater value, agility, and alignment between technology and day-to-day operations. The following key advantages illustrate why many organizations view ERP customization as not merely an option, but a critical driver of competitive differentiation and sustained growth.

    • Enhanced Alignment with Business Processes – Customization enables organizations to mold the ERP system to fit their established processes, rather than forcing users to adapt to the software. For businesses with unique workflows, regulatory requirements, or industry-specific practices, customization can be crucial for maintaining operational efficiency.
    • Competitive Advantage – By tailoring the ERP to support proprietary methods, innovative products, or distinctive service models, organizations can reinforce what makes them unique and potentially gain an edge over competitors.
    • Improved User Adoption – When software aligns closely with existing habits and terminology, users are more likely to embrace it, reducing training time and resistance to change.
    • Integration with External Systems – Customizations can facilitate seamless connections to legacy applications, partner systems, or specialized hardware, supporting broader digital strategies.
    • Enhanced Reporting and Analytics – Organizations often need to track custom metrics or produce reports not supported by OOTB configurations. Customization ensures access to the right data in the right format.

    Disadvantages of Customizing an ERP Platform

    Despite these compelling benefits of customizing an ERP platform, customizing is not without its drawbacks. While tailored solutions can drive alignment and competitive differentiation, they also introduce a range of challenges that organizations must carefully weigh. The following section outlines some of the most significant disadvantages associated with ERP customization, illuminating the trade-offs that come with pursuing a bespoke approach.

    • Increased Cost and Complexity – Custom development requires skilled resources and can significantly increase the time and budget required for implementation as well as ongoing support.
    • Upgrade and Maintenance Challenges – Vendor updates to ERP software may conflict with custom code, making upgrades more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. Some organizations delay critical updates or forgo them entirely to avoid breaking customizations, exposing themselves to security and compliance risks.
    • Vendor Support Limitations – Extensive modifications may void vendor warranties or limit access to technical support, as customized systems may no longer be covered under standard agreements.
    • Risk of Over-Customization – Organizations sometimes fall into the trap of customizing for the sake of preference rather than necessity, adding unnecessary features that bloat the system and complicate future changes.
    • Long-Term Technical Debt – Customizations can tie an organization to legacy processes or platforms, reducing flexibility to adapt as the business evolves or as new technological opportunities arise.

    Advantages of Out-of-the-Box ERP Solutions

    While customization offers powerful opportunities to tailor an ERP system, many organizations ultimately find that the standard, OOTB approach delivers a compelling set of benefits. Leveraging preconfigured features allows businesses to sidestep many of the pitfalls associated with bespoke development and instead capitalize on solutions designed for reliability, scalability, and ease of use. The following advantages illustrate why OOTB ERP solutions continue to appeal to organizations seeking efficiency and long-term value.

    • Lower Initial Cost and Faster Implementation – Using standard features minimizes development time and consulting expenses, allowing organizations to realize benefits more quickly.
    • Simplified Upgrades and Maintenance – OOTB systems are easier to keep current with vendor releases, reducing security risks and ensuring continuous access to new features and improvements.
    • Leading Practices Built In – ERP vendors design their standard workflows based on industry practices, helping organizations align with proven, efficient approaches.
    • Stronger Vendor Support – Organizations using unmodified systems are more likely to receive timely and effective vendor support.
    • Lower Long-Term Cost of Ownership – Reduced need for specialized consultants and custom development often translates into lower ongoing costs.

    Disadvantages of Out-of-the-Box ERP Solutions

    While out-of-the-box ERP solutions offer compelling advantages in terms of efficiency, cost, and support, they are not without their drawbacks. It is important to carefully weigh these potential disadvantages to ensure that an OOTB system truly aligns with the organization’s unique needs and long-term goals. The following challenges should be considered before committing to a standard approach:

    • Process Misalignment – Standard workflows may not fully accommodate unique business requirements, forcing the organization to adapt its processes or maintain inefficient workarounds.
    • Reduced Competitive Differentiation – If all organizations in an industry use the same standard ERP solution, it becomes harder to stand out or capitalize on unique capabilities.
    • Possible Decrease in User Adoption – Employees may resist adopting systems that do not reflect their familiar terminology or established ways of working.
    • Limited Flexibility – Out-of-the-box solutions may lack critical features or be unable to integrate smoothly with other essential systems.

    How to Determine the Best Approach

    Selecting the right ERP solution is a pivotal decision that shapes an organization’s operations for years to come. While OOTB systems offer the promise of efficiency and lower costs, customization can provide the flexibility required to support distinctive business models or strategic objectives. The decision is rarely straightforward; it requires a thoughtful assessment of business priorities, available resources, and long-term goals. To navigate this complex landscape, organizations need to look beyond surface-level benefits and carefully weigh the trade-offs inherent to each approach.

    A well-informed choice considers not only present needs, but also how the system will evolve alongside the organization. The following key factors offer a framework for evaluating whether customization, an OOTB solution, or a hybrid of both will best serve your business now and into the future:

    • Business Requirements – Identify which processes are truly unique or provide strategic value. If the majority of your operations can be supported by standard ERP functionality, you may benefit from an OOTB approach. Customization should be reserved for areas that directly contribute to competitive advantage or compliance.
    • Budget and Resources – Assess both the initial and ongoing costs associated with customization, including the need for specialized skill sets and increased testing/maintenance.
    • Scalability and Future Readiness – Consider how easily the system can be scaled or adapted to changing business needs. Over-customization can hinder future growth or require expensive rework.
    • Vendor Ecosystem and Upgrade Path – Evaluate the vendor’s history of updates, backward compatibility, and support for custom code. Favor solutions that balance flexibility with a robust upgrade path.
    • User Adoption and Change Management – Involve end users early in the decision process to understand their needs and secure their buy-in. Sometimes, investing in training and process change management can make OOTB solutions feasible.
    • Regulatory and Compliance Requirements – In highly regulated industries, customization may be essential to meet specific compliance mandates.

    Leading Practices and Guidelines

    In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, choosing the right ERP is a decision of lasting consequence. Organizations are often presented with a fundamental dilemma: whether to embrace a ready-made, OOTB solution or to invest in tailored customization. Each path carries its own set of advantages and challenges, and the stakes are high – impacting everything from operational efficiency to long-term scalability. Navigating this decision demands a nuanced understanding of both present day realities and future ambitions.

    • Adopt a “Configure First, Customize Last” Approach

    Maximize use of configuration—changes made through settings, not code—before turning to true customization.

    • Document All Customizations

    Maintain clear, thorough documentation to ensure future upgrades and troubleshooting are manageable.

    • Regularly Review and Rationalize Customizations

    Periodically assess whether custom features still provide value, or if they can be replaced with new standard functionality.

    • Engage Stakeholders Across the Organization

    Solicit input from IT, operations, finance, and end users to ensure the ERP system aligns with the organization’s strategic objectives.

    Conclusion

    Customizing an ERP can unlock significant value by aligning software to the unique needs and aspirations of an organization. However, it also introduces complexity, cost, and risk that must be carefully managed. Out-of-the-box solutions, on the other hand, offer simplicity, speed, and enhanced vendor support, but may fall short where business differentiation is essential. The optimal approach balances these considerations, focusing customization on areas of true strategic importance and embracing standard solutions wherever possible.

    Ultimately, organizations should undertake a thorough analysis of their business processes, resources, and long-term goals, consulting with stakeholders and experienced ERP professionals to chart a path that maximizes value, agility, and competitiveness.

    Jim Wadella, Founder

  2. Evolving Tactics in Working Capital Transformation

    Leave a Comment


    Working capital transformation has become a priority for businesses in 2025, driven by economic volatility, technological advancements, and evolving regulatory environments. Companies are adopting new tactics to optimize cash flow, improve liquidity, and support sustainable growth.

    A leading tactic is the centralization of cash management processes. By consolidating cash management, organizations boost visibility and efficiency while reducing costs. This approach allows for better control over payables and receivables, ensuring that working capital is not unnecessarily tied up in operations. Process optimization, such as streamlining operations and reducing cycle times, helps free up cash and enhances agility in responding to market changes.

    Investment in advanced technology is reshaping working capital management. Companies are deploying enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, cloud-based platforms, and automation tools to gain real-time insights into cash positions, inventory, and receivables. Data analytics, predictive modeling, and artificial intelligence (AI) enable more accurate cash flow forecasting, helping businesses anticipate shortfalls and opportunities well in advance. Automation of accounts payable and receivable processes reduces manual errors and accelerates transaction cycles.

    With supply chain volatility and tightening credit markets, businesses are exploring flexible financing solutions such as dynamic discounting and reverse factoring. These tactics help negotiate better payment terms with suppliers and improve the cash conversion cycle. Collaboration with banking partners and the use of digital-first, on-demand financing platforms are becoming essential for ensuring liquidity and supporting growth.

    A focus on improving working capital management in 2025 is driven by the integration of technology, process centralization, and flexible financing. These tactics not only improve liquidity and operational efficiency, but also position companies to navigate uncertainty and seize growth opportunities.

    -Jeffrey Kupper, Senior Director

  3. ERP Trouble: Four Reasons You Have It

    Leave a Comment


    ERP Trouble Stems from Complexity

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are the backbone of modern business operations, integrating functions across finance, supply chain, human resources, and more. However, implementing or upgrading an ERP system is no small feat. It’s a complex project that can involve significant time, resources, and change management. While many ERP vendors and systems integrators promise streamlined processes and improved efficiency, the road to a successful ERP implementation is often fraught with challenges. In fact, many ERP projects experience delays, cost overruns, or fail to deliver the expected benefits.

    So why do these projects face problems? In this post, we’ll explore the top four reasons ERP projects struggle, and how businesses can avoid these common pitfalls.

    Reason 1 | Too big a change

    Upgrading an ERP system is seldom as simple as just swapping systems. Typically, an ERP upgrade or implementation requires significant changes in culture, competencies, and processes.

    If the scale of change needed in these areas in order to be successful is too large, or change management has been underestimated and / or under resourced, then it is likely the ERP project will see trouble.

    Reason 2 | Digital immaturity

    Some organizations do not have the basic technological infrastructure and supporting resources to be ready to adopt new ERP systems. If an organization’s underlying IT is not sufficiently developed, this may hinder an overhanging ERP project.

    Reason 3 | Lack of project governance

    It takes a village: for an ERP system to serve an organization well, it needs to account for requirements across all business functions and stakeholders.

    Therefore, during planning and implementation, there needs to be strong project governance mechanisms in place to manage cross-functional interplay, and provide clear leadership, well defined roles, and oversight on tracking risks and deliverables, with key sponsors and decision makers involved throughout the process.

    Without this, ERP projects typically suffer, delivering late, over budget, and not to requirements, if at all.

    Reason 4 | Over-customization

    An insistence on replicating a highly customized legacy ERP within a new ERP system is often a large red flag. Either there is not enough organizational buy-in to be truly ready to embark on the change, or the level of complexity and risk is multiplied, often by an order of magnitude.

    Either way, such insistence typically negates much of the financial and business benefit logic of upgrading to a new system (but the vendors and systems integrators will not tell you this, as they make more money when a client customizes / over customizes). This also means that the client may miss out on the best out-of-the-box and configurable features of the modern ERP system they chose to move to (as they are replicating a less modern system).

    Want to avoid these mistakes?

    Core Catalysts has a wealth of experience and expertise in helping clients assess their current readiness for ERP projects, prepare for change, align stakeholders, and select the right ERP vendors and systems integrators to ensure success.

    Likewise, we are skilled in guiding clients through the complex choices of customization versus out-of-the-box functionality and configuration, and in assisting clients with ERP project management and governance so that their projects are delivered on time, on-budget, to specification, with business disruption minimized, in order to realize the business benefits that underwrote the original ERP implementation / upgrade decision.

    Find out more

    Are you considering implementing a new ERP system? Do you want to make sure you avoid these potential pitfalls and are set up for success?

    If so, reach out to schedule an initial call or meeting with our ERP project subject matter experts, where you can tell us about your situation, we’ll ask questions and listen until we understand, and then offer suggestions on next steps.

    You won’t regret it!

  4. ERP: When and How to Upgrade Your System

    Leave a Comment

    When analyzing the effectiveness of your ERP system, consider the following questions:

    • Are you relying on multiple systems and software solutions to manage your business?
    • Do you feel a lot of time is being wasted on manual processes and data input?
    • Do your current business systems suffer from an obvious lack of features, slow or glitchy performance, reduced support, or potential security issues?
    • Is it overly complex and difficult to onboard new staff, set up new reports, or find, access, and use accurate data?
    • Are you missing out on sales because you don’t have the right products in stock or can’t get orders to customers quickly enough?
    • Are you running at 100% capacity and don’t know how to grow your business without expanding?
    • Do you seem to not be making as much money as you should within certain channels or with certain customers?

    These are all signs that it might be time to upgrade your ERP system.

    While e-commerce, machine learning, AI, and the cloud have been front-of-mind topics in recent years, today’s economy means that, no matter what industry, and no matter whether you are a manufacturing or service company, having a robust ERP platform is a top business priority.

    Right now, many of our clients are considering upgrading their ERP systems to strengthen their supply chains, upgrade their supply chain management capabilities, improve operating efficiency (countering inflationary pressures), and maximize production / service delivery capacity, thereby enabling future growth.

    We’ve been involved in and have led multiple ERP upgrades and implementations. Their impact on business performance and metrics (e.g., service levels, inventory and materials days on hand, margins, etc.) has been transformative. This enables measurable growth in revenue and profit, with clear returns on the efforts and investment.

    However, approaching your ERP upgrade the wrong way can be catastrophic. ERP implementations are typically time consuming and complex, and botched ERP implementations have been known to decrease supply chain visibility, tank revenue and profit, and drive ongoing incremental complexity and expense. In fact, some estimates indicate that three-quarters of ERP transformations fail to stay on schedule or on budget, and around two-thirds of ERP upgrade projects have a negative return on investment.¹

    So if you are considering upgrading your ERP system, and want to avoid the potential pitfalls, what should you do?

    With collective experience in ERP implementation spanning hundreds of years, the Core Catalysts team have identified five critical factors that consistently contribute to success.

    Strong SI vendor selection and management

    Most ERP software providers do not sell directly to customers, relying on Systems Implementation (SI) partners for all but the largest customers. While there are many high-quality ERP SI’s out there, we have found that there are also a lot of mediocre ones, so much so that we often say that SI selection is as important as ERP system selection.

    Equally, we have seen many companies assume that their ERP SI will not need a lot of management once they have been selected. Unfortunately, too many times have we seen a “fox guarding the hen house” situation develop, where the incentive for the SI to increase scope and duration (and thereby, fees) becomes too much for them to resist.

    Therefore, critical factor number one for successful ERP implementations is strong SI vendor selection and management.

    Strong Project Management

    Linked to the first critical success factor, we have seen many ERP implementations fail due to an organization’s lack of experience in managing major IT projects and multivendor programs.

    ERP projects in particular benefit from rigorous project management systems, protocols, and governance, meaning that there is typically a strong ROI from bringing in an outside consultant like us to help project manage implementation.

    Equally, investment in outside project management help has the dual benefit of reducing “stresses” to the organization that can arise from having internal subject matter experts divert time and attention away from their “day jobs” towards managing an ERP implementation.

    So, critical success factor number two is strong project management.

    Investment in Requirements Gathering/Generation

    Similar to the second critical success factor, many organizations fail to understand the level of input needed from business sponsors to successfully define the requirements (i.e., the functionality a system needs to have and the scope of what the system needs to be able to do) and struggle to manage the multiple, complex, detailed discussions needed, even when they have adequate resources and capabilities internally to do this (which they often don’t).

    Frequently we see clients rush headlong into an ERP implementation without taking adequate time or effort to answer important requirements questions around items such as operating models, workflows, and processes, or considerations such as data management and validation rights. Subsequently, this often leads to mid-program issues (and schedule and cost overruns) that undermine confidence in the project, as well as the potential for the ERP implementation to deliver positive operational and financial returns.

    This is why Core Catalysts often includes assistance in requirements gathering/generation upfront within an ERP implementation project as part of our project management approach. This is also why many of our clients see a strong ROI in engaging us within ERP implementation projects.

    A good example of this is how frequently we are able to reduce both the upfront implementation expense and ongoing operating expenses of new ERP systems. We do this by helping clients maximize the usage of standard configurations and out-of-the-box functionality. By focusing and aligning client stakeholders on business requirements, we are able to reduce the number of customizations that often drive both costs and complexity!

    Therefore, critical success factor number three is investment (of both time and money) in requirements gathering/generation at the beginning of an ERP implementation.

    Investment in Change Management

    Similar to the third critical success factor, many organizations fail to understand the importance of investing in “change management” (including training, communications, and user acceptance testing) in order to achieve the projected benefits of an ERP system upgrade.

    Many times, we have seen projects sponsors query the dollar value of the “change management” line item in an ERP implementation budget. They see it as a cost to be reduced versus the investment that it actually is. Investing in change management helps to drive faster speed of adoption, higher ultimate utilization, and greater proficiency which all generate measurable and meaningful financial returns.

    Time and time again, we see a high correlation between investment in change management and ultimate achievement of projected financial and organizational benefits from ERP upgrades. Skimping on change management is a false economy!

    Focus on Business Value / Benefits

    It is very easy to get caught up in the technological considerations surrounding the business case for an ERP implementation. Your system is old, it doesn’t work quite how you’d like it to, processes are manual, etc.

    However, unless these issues are mission critical (i.e., they are threatening the long-term sustainability and success of your organization), it is important to identify the business value/benefits of any proposed investment in a new (or upgraded) ERP system.

    Too often, we see companies spend most of their time on roadmaps, activities, and deliverables, and too little time on the business case when considering whether or not to invest in an ERP implementation. If a business case is not well quantified, documented, and monitored during and after the implementation, is it any wonder so many ERP projects fail to deliver positive returns on investment?

    This is why our successful ERP implementations balance the technological considerations and unmet business needs / opportunities with a strong eye on developing a business case. This leads to delivery of the business value/benefits that underpinned the original investment decision.

    In conclusion, with good SI selection and management, strong project management, upfront investment in requirements gathering/generation, and a focus on business case/value creation, upgrading your ERP system can be an important enabler of business growth and maintaining and improving your business performance.

    If you’d like to discuss how Core Catalysts might be able to help you decide whether or not it is time to upgrade your ERP system, or how we can help you in implementation, please give us a call!

    -Core Catalysts Team


    ¹Casanova, Lohiya, Loufrani, Pacca, and Peters (2019), “Agile in enterprise resource planning: A myth no more”, McKinsey & Company

Thank you for Visiting Core Catalysts!

To continue reading this content, please provide the following information.

Get Our Latest Content