Tag Archive: pandemic

  1. Staying Ahead on Debt Service: Focus on Cash Management and Cost Takeouts

    Leave a Comment

    The upcoming debt “maturity wall”

    High interest rates and other borrowing costs continue to rattle businesses in all sectors of the US economy. With refinancing also becoming harder and more costly as much of the debt taken on during the pandemic (at lower rates) rapidly matures, there are fears of an upcoming debt “maturity wall” that will depress productivity and business performance.

    To avoid your own “debt maturity wall,” timing is key: businesses should be looking for productivity improvements, cost-takeout opportunities, and cash-flow strategies at least six to nine months ahead of when they foresee debt service challenges starting to “hit.”

    Unfortunately, many businesses can no longer rely on the benchmarks, expectations, and metrics they’ve used to assess their businesses in the past: EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) is not always an accurate reflection of a company’s health, especially when it comes to debt payments.

    While the old ways of measuring the health of your business may be changing, one thing has not: a focus on rigorous cash management remains key to staying ahead on debt service.

    So how should you be managing debt in today’s volatile economy, and looking ahead to try and proactively prepare and avoid issues? Below we outline five best practices to manage cash, cut costs, and stay afloat as debt comes due.

    Build a stronger cash-flow model

    As debt servicing adds strain to many businesses, it’s more important than ever that they have a comprehensive, closely managed cash-flow model to understand the real implications of refinancing on their balance sheets. Most organizations simply rely on financial assumptions and forecasts rather than a cash-flow model built on true sources (i.e., the full variety of revenue streams) and uses (like payroll, vendor payments, rent, etc.). The model should factor in timing of cash in-flows and out-flows, as well as reserve requirements where applicable.

    Understand how to stretch your cash management cycle

     With a proper cash-flow model in place, businesses can find smart ways to stretch their cash management cycles (i.e., understanding when you’re receiving cash and when you owe cash so that you can extend those timelines).

    On the payable side, this might involve negotiating new terms with vendors to better align payables with receivables.

    On the receivable side, consider how well you are managing the payment terms and credit lines of your customers, make improvements where necessary, and also ensure you are adequately managing (aging) accounts receivables.

    Think about the cash impact of inventory

    Many businesses have some form of inventory. It is vital that you understand how quickly inventory is moving so you are not paying for anything that is lingering or aging (and declining in value versus your carrying costs).

    This requires digging into the details. For instance:

    • What are your fast-moving items?
    • How can you rebalance your buys and measure inventory, both from a return on investment (margin and profit) perspective, and with regard to how quickly it can be converted into cash?
    • What are the “hard” costs (i.e., dollars and cents) and “soft” costs (i.e., opportunity costs) of carrying too much (or too little) inventory, and how can these be mitigated?

    While doing your analysis, segment inventory performance by product types (i.e., core products versus fringe offerings), as well as by channels, then place bets on proven products and customers so that you don’t have inventory tied up in low-performing areas.

    Companies without inventory discipline may struggle with proactively managing aged stocks. In many cases, this inventory may not be tracked diligently, or when companies do track it, assessments may not accurately reflect the inventory’s carrying costs, including cost of working capital. Hesitation to manage aged inventory may stem from potential impacts to the borrowing base for asset-based loans and/or the reporting of merchandise margins.

    Mistakes will still happen, which is why it is critical to also have end-of-life discipline and processes in place for exiting excess inventory in a timely manner. Do you already have these in place? If not, develop them ASAP!

    Reassess cost structures (and tie them to healthy margins)

    If you are concerned about debt service, now may be the time to undertake a thorough review of your cost structures, including general and administrative expenses, indirect spend, and costs of goods sold (COGS).

    We always recommend starting out with an “80/20” approach in a “first pass” review, focusing on the large and important line items (80% of expenses), where identified reductions could make a meaningful impact on the bottom line (helping with debt service). We then recommend doing a second pass, digging deep into the “20%” (which typically covers more discretionary items), where it may be easier to identify reductions, but those reductions might have less of a bottom-line impact, and might have other impacts (on long-term growth and sustainability) that may outweigh the benefits.

    When was the last time your company did a similar “root and branch” cost structure review? Has your company engaged in a competitive bidding process (for both direct and indirect spend) in recent years? If your answer is either “I don’t know” or “not for quite a while,” then now might be the time!

    But please remember: exercises like this won’t lead to efficiencies if done in siloes; leaders across departments need to be involved.

    Focus on operational improvements to fund growth, not borrowing

    Even if a company is under financial pressure, it is vital that they continue to make investments in their businesses, products / service offerings, and technology to stay competitive.

    But as long as interest rates remain high, operational improvements resulting in better productivity should be explored as a means to fund these investments and reduce the need for taking on more debt. When you do make investments, be sure to consider the impact on cash flow.

    Conclusions

    Money = Time, Time = Options.

    Bankruptcies are on the uptick in many sectors of the economy, and debts can’t be refinanced forever. The old ways of measuring the health of your business are also transforming. In today’s market, rigorous cash management is key.

    Use the above strategies to understand where you’re at now, so that you have time and capital to make necessary adjustments before it’s too late. The closer you get to potential default, the fewer tools you’ll have in your arsenal to prevent it.

    If you would like some help with all this, contact Core Catalysts. With deep expertise and a team of very experienced “hands-on” practitioners, we can quickly assess where you might have opportunities, identify the best paths forward, and assist you in implementing and executing against these (and other) best practices.

    Mark Jacobs, Client Service and Delivery

  2. Questions for 2022 Pt. 4: Automation

    Leave a Comment

    Today we offer the final post in a series focusing on questions for 2022. You can read the previous posts on data literacy, price increases, and expense control here, here, and here.

    This week, we further explore the opportunity to evaluate (or reevaluate) business cases for increased automation in light of the current business environment, and the likely continued knock-on effects of the pandemic.

    What we already know:

    As in previous weeks, let’s take what we know about 2022, and then apply it to the question.

    The current US labor market is unlike any previously experienced in recent memory:

    • A greater than expected death rate has reduced the like-for-like labor pool
    • Greater than average retirement rates have also reduced the like-for-like labor pool
    • A shortage of affordable childcare has also negatively impacted the labor market

    These and other pandemic driven factors have given rise to unprecedented labor shortages, pressure to increase wages, greater than average labor turnover (“The Great Resignation”), and HR nightmares all around.

    Great, but so what?

    The bottom line is that many businesses cannot find qualified candidates to fill open positions. Even when they are offering above market rates, putting revenue, profit, growth, and even long-term business viability at stake, there remains a shortage of viable candidates.

    This is where the question of automation comes in.

    In our experience as consultants, we’ve often seen clients consider the investment and business case for increased automation. This is across many industries and business functions, looking at everything from the standard evaluation of more efficient heavy machinery to consideration of exotic solutions involving robots and artificial intelligence, through to more mundane decisions on IT. Many times, even when the return on investment is clear and the business benefits obvious, they hesitate to make these investments due to perceived risks, the availability of labor, and the fact that their businesses could still operate satisfactorily without increasing automation.

    In most cases this was probably the right decision at the time. But the question now is, “Can businesses really afford not to consider and implement increased automation solutions?”

    If labor is a sizable part of your business expenses, and your labor costs are increasing, now is the time to look at labor saving and automation solutions no matter what the industry or function.

    In the past, automation investment cases may have hinged on reducing existing headcount. Now, they might revolve around the mission critical reality that people cannot be found to do the work that needs to be done for the business to operate.

    Equally, maximizing productivity and job satisfaction of existing employees in the tight labor market may also provide a compelling case for investment.

    Essentially, investment cases for automation may now be about more than just simple margin improvement, or cost takeout opportunities that previously you could afford to ignore or not do. They could relate and be the answer to existential threats to ongoing business sustainability.

    Conclusions

    If, for whatever reason, you have previously considered automation but decided not to move forward, it may make sense to revisit these potential opportunities.

    Now might be the right time to identify and evaluate automation opportunities. It might also be time to implement anything that is either a quick-win or that could be transformational, be that from an operational or financial perspective.

    Core Catalysts regularly helps clients identify opportunities for increased automation and build business cases to support investment decisions. We also aid in vendor selection through to project management and implementation of automation initiatives, across all sizes, types, and durations of project. If you believe we could help your organization, why not reach out to us to schedule a call?

    We hope you have enjoyed this series of thought-starters for 2022. Thank you once again for reading and please share any thought or comments you have.

    Mark Jacobs, Client Service & Delivery

  3. Questions for 2022 Pt. 3: Cost Structure and Expenses

    Leave a Comment

    This week, we’ll further explore the pressing need to review cost structures and all major business expenses in light of how business has changed (and will never go back to how it was pre-pandemic).

    What we already know:

    Once again, let’s take what we know about 2022, and then apply it to the question:

    • Some jobs and activities will always be in-person, and some organizations now feel confident enough to mandate returns to the office. However, remote-working has become a fact of life during the pandemic, and many organizations and people may choose not to return to their old in-person, in-office schedules and ways of working.
    • Business travel expenditures are still radically below pre-pandemic levels. And yet, most organizations have found ways to overcome travel limitations to their business development, operational management, and delivery activities in the short to mid-term.
    • It’s too early to fully know what the future of the office and the commercial real estate market is, but it’s likely that many organizations’ future office space and design needs will be different (both during and after the pandemic). Warehousing and other real estate needs may also be different moving forward.

    Great, but so what?

    First off, have you re-evaluated your real-estate needs versus your current real-estate footprint, given how business has changed and how future requirements may be different in the future?

    Real estate costs (including rent, utilities, facilities, and maintenance) can be a significant expense in many businesses. If future needs translate to the need for less office space, what are you doing to realize these potential cost savings? Equally, if your real estate needs will be different, are you budgeting for any required capital investment, such as for physical updates to office spaces?

    Another outcome of the pandemic is a record demand for warehousing and fulfillment center properties, and other logistics related real estate. So, even if your office space needs haven’t changed, what about these kinds of needs? Rather than offering an expense reduction opportunity, this might even be another area of rapidly increasing (potentially spiraling) business expense that deserves further analysis and action to bring it under greater control.

    Secondly, have you adequately and effectively reallocated budgets previously allocated to business travel? Moreover, have you considered whether your organization will return to previous levels of spending after the pandemic?

    Reduced business travel has not reduced the need for facetime with customers, colleagues, and vendors. However, the fact that most organizations have managed so well despite less travel does suggest that returning to previous spending levels may not be necessary. Equally, even if spend can’t (or shouldn’t) be reduced, how is it going to be reallocated to ensure business results and ROI if old travel activities (conferences, junkets, etc.) are going to be less prevalent?

    Thirdly, collaboration tools such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meetings have improved significantly in the last few years, as has their utilization by many organizations. Gaps and opportunities still exist, however. Has your organization fully accounted for the likely hardware, software, and other financial and capital investment implications of the increased usage of IT collaboration tools?

    Some of these incremental costs may already be obvious and/or known, but some may be less so. As examples:

    • Giving employees regular home office “stipends” for equipment costs is becoming more common. Should you be doing this, and how should you reduce corporate office expenses to offset?
    • Providing the same hands-on hardware and technology support employees are used to in a corporate setting is harder and more expensive in a remote work setting.
    • Will a prolonged increase in remote working have subsequent bandwidth, licensing, hardware, and infrastructure implications (and if so, what are the financial implications)?

    If you haven’t already, now is the time to more deeply review the longer-term impact of the pandemic on your IT organization and infrastructure, and how this could translate to your financial bottom line.

    Finally, we’ve mentioned in previous posts that worker shortages (translating into higher labor costs) have been another consequence of the pandemic’s impact on cost structures. Reviewing labor costs should be another priority for most businesses, but this topic deserves its own deep dive and will be the topic of the next post in this series.

    Conclusions

    Changes in how many organizations do business, including the increase in remote work and reductions in business travel, offer opportunities to re-evaluate cost structures and business expenses. These changes also highlight the need to identify and evaluate future financial implications. Core Catalysts regularly helps clients assess financial and operational efficiency and effectiveness to understand and optimize business operations and cost structure. We’ve also helped multiple customers optimize their IT strategies and infrastructure to match today’s changing environment. If you believe we could help your organization with this, why not reach out to us and schedule a call?

    Thanks once again for reading and please share any thoughts or comments you have. We’ll see you again in two weeks for the final post in the series, which will cover the question of business automation during and after the pandemic.

    Mark Jacobs, Client Service & Delivery

  4. Questions for 2022 Pt. 2: Price Increases

    Leave a Comment

    Two weeks ago, we wrote about four questions for 2022 based on factors that we can all agree will influence our business this year. We went further and addressed the first question: Is your organization data literate enough?

    We’ve received some interesting comments related to the need for greater data literacy in organizations. This would enable better examination of weak links in the supply chain, operations process improvement in areas susceptible to disruption, and generally increase organizational flexibility and dexterity across all functions in response to this new “VUCA” world.

    This week, let’s dive into the second question we raised: Should you be considering price increases?

    What we already know:

    Once again, let’s take what we know about 2022, and then apply it to the question:

    • It’s generally accepted that inflation in the United States is currently running around 7%.
    • Unprecedented supply chain challenges and labor disturbances brought on by the pandemic have throttled output. At the same time, the pandemic has increased various costs (such as increased expenditure on PPE, safety protocols, etc.) leading to both increased business expenses and decreased productivity.
    • Conversely, unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus has turned demand in the opposite direction to supply.
    • Unemployment rates are at historical lows, creating additional worker shortages and upward pressure on labor costs (meaning additional incremental business expenses).

    Great, but so what?

    No one knows whether current inflation rates will be a short-term aberration or a long-term reality.

    Equally, while supply and demand-side economics may eventually achieve equilibrium, it is highly likely that post-pandemic business expenses will be higher than pre-pandemic ones, affecting profit margins.

    In order to maintain profit margins, businesses can do three things:

    • Decrease expenses
    • Increase prices (to increase like-for-like revenue)
    • Increase volume (to decrease relative costs, increase relative margin through economies of scale, and boost revenue)

    An oft-quoted McKinsey study succinctly lays out the comparative effectiveness of these three strategies:

    “A price rise of 1 percent, if volumes remained stable, would generate an 8 percent increase in operating profits – an impact nearly 50 percent greater than that of a 1 percent fall in variable costs such as materials and direct labor, and more than three times greater than the impact of a 1 percent increase in volume.”

    Put simply, like-for-like, price increases are far more effective than the alternate strategies.

    In the context of 2022, one could also contend the following: While effectively implementing price increases is difficult, it will be even more difficult (nigh impossible) to cut your way to margin maintenance or to increase volumes significantly enough, bearing in mind the expense pressures we are all facing.

    But there’s the rub: effective implementation of price increases.

    The stigma of price increases

    We’ve been involved in multiple price increase projects, and we can tell you the following:

    • Most organizations don’t like asking for price increases (and are bad at implementing them when they do)
    • Most customers don’t like price increases either
    • More than 50% of the time, the net impact of price increases (after concessions to big customers) is either break-even, or negative
    • Done badly, price increases can (negatively) affect customer relationships.

    However, can your business afford not to raise prices right now? If you cannot, what should you do?

    Build your business case for the price increase

    Data disarms. It’s hard to argue with evidence of increased expenses outside of your control, and customers with professional procurement functions will appreciate a fact-based approach.

    Communicate clearly

    In addition to a clear business case, customers respect vendors who communicate clearly. Your message should reinforce shared values, mutual respect, and commitment to an ongoing and mutually beneficial business relationship.

    Plan, Plan, Plan

    Achieving effective price increases is an important muscle in your business. If you are out of practice, the best way to overcome this is to invest the right amount of time, resources, and executive oversight into planning and managing your price increase activities.

    Conclusions

    Based on the extreme levels of expense increases your business is experiencing, you may have no choice but to consider increasing prices. This does not mean that expense reductions are impossible or inadvisable (see the third post in this series), or that increased labor costs cannot be mitigated longer term (see the fourth post in this series), but increasing prices effectively is going to take some time and effort, and you may not have all the resources, experience, and expertise to do this on your own. If this is the case, Core Catalysts may be able to help!

    Thanks once again for reading. Please share any thoughts or comments you have, and we’ll see you again in two weeks for the next question in the series: Have we adequately reviewed business cost structures and all major business expenses in light of how business has changed?

    Mark Jacobs, Client Service & Delivery

  5. Thought Starting Questions for 2022

    Leave a Comment

    It’s that time of year again. Businesses are going about making confident predictions on what the next twelve months will hold for them. And yet, even at the best of times the accuracy of these predictions will be questionable by December. Given all that, perhaps the point of these predictions is less about being right, and more about creating engagement for the marketing folks?

    But as we all know, we are not living in normal times right now. No one can really see into the future, and it is not possible to be completely sure what the next year holds. Just as well, your time is valuable, so why waste it reading another set of bold predictions for 2022 that have questionable value just to boost someone’s marketing metrics?

    To this end, we humbly offer you a brief series of thought-starting questions that might actually be helpful and worth pondering if you are considering the year ahead. This will be the first of many blog posts to follow in the coming weeks, all of which will explore these questions a little more thoroughly.

    2022: What can we be confident about?

    There are three things we can be relatively sure of:

    • The Covid 19 pandemic, and its effects on business, are not over yet.
    • Specifically, supply chain issues and labor shortages are going to continue to be concerns for most of us for at least the next twelve months.
    • Higher inflation is definitely going to be an economic factor for the next twelve months, and possibly longer.

    How do these factors influence what I should be thinking about for this year?

    If you agree with the three driving points identified above, four key questions for 2022 stand out. These questions are linear and feed into each other. They are:

    #1 Does my organization have the right level of Data Literacy, and is it in the right areas and functions?

    There are some real-life “nuts and bolts” things that most businesses need to be thinking about and working on in this area.

    #2 Do we need to be considering Price Increases?

    And if they are needed, how do we actually implement them effectively, as opposed to just talking about them but not doing anything, or trying to implement them and just ending up upsetting our customers and / or not achieving any financial benefit.

    #3 Have we adequately reviewed business cost structures and all major business expenses in light of how business has changed?

    And what’s more, will it ever go back to how it was pre-pandemic?

    #4 Should we revisit (or visit for the first time) business investment cases for enhanced and increased automation?

    Historically, whether or not to invest in automation has been a decision based purely on ROI and ease of implementation. If wage inflation and labor shortages continue, increased automation may cease to be a choice and become a necessity to ensure operational viability, continuity, and long-term business sustainability. In other words, can you afford to not automate more?

    Exploring Question One

    This week, let’s dive a little deeper in thinking about the question, “Does my organization have the right level of Data Literacy, and is it in the right areas and functions?”

    What we already know:

    Once again, let’s take what we know about 2022, and then apply it to the question:

    • It’s generally accepted that inflation in the United States is currently running around 7%, and no one knows whether this is a short-term aberration, or if it will be a longer-term reality.
    • Based on current lifespans, average retirement age, and the law of averages, at least 80% of the current working population have no experience living or managing a business in a prolonged (or even relatively short) period of such high levels of inflation.
    • Likewise, most people working today are used to Just-in-time (JIT), Kaizen, and other lean manufacturing and supply chain practices (implemented across the eighties, nineties, and aughts, creating significant cost savings in a time when economies struggled) and either have not experienced or barely remember a time when things worked differently.

    Great, but so what?

    Well, the challenges of 2022 mean that having people who can work with current IT systems, pull data, and then report on and take standardized or rote actions just isn’t enough anymore.

    What businesses now need are people who can interpret the stories behind the data. People that can develop insights and actions that consider imperfect supply chains and labor availability are in high demand. These are people that can see the many complex dependencies and interdependencies, both internally and externally, that are either hidden or are not things that businesses previously had to worry about (pre-pandemic).

    Recognition of a deficit in required data literacy in many organizations is the reason why it is so hard to hire demand planners, business analysts, and supply chain specialists right now. This deficit isn’t just a supply chain and manufacturing issue. It spans across all functions, including administrative functions like HR (such as labor planning, scheduling, etc.) and finance (such as maintaining margins during times of extreme changes in expenses/revenue).

    The question, then, is as follows: Do you have the right people with the right skills to interpret and manage through a time of great variability and ambiguity? We’re in business territory that most people have never experienced, and businesses need skills and experience that perhaps they once had, but that have also likely atrophied after an extended period of disuse.

    Conclusion

    Your answers to this question will probably lead nicely to the next post on price increases. A subset of data literacy is the ability to pull together all the information needed to identify whether or not price increases are needed, how much they should be increased by, and the data that is needed to justify increases to customers. Even if you have this capability, when is the last time you asked for a price increase, and how well did it go?

    Here at Core Catalysts, we’ve helped multiple clients analyze their data literacy. In doing so, we’ve also helped clients identify issues and opportunities with meaningful impact to their top and bottom lines, and then helped them fill important gaps in organizational capabilities. This allowed them to take action to capitalize on available opportunities, spanning everything from IT system evaluation and implementation through identifying and hiring new employees. If you believe we could help your organization with this, why not reach out to us and schedule a call?

    In the meantime, we hope reading this article and thinking about these questions has been worth your time. We welcome comments and additional thoughts, and please reach out if you’d like to talk more about your current organizational data literacy and tackling some of these challenges!

    Mark Jacobs, Client Service & Delivery

  6. Supply Chain: Re-Shoring, On-Shoring, and Buffer Options

    Leave a Comment

    “However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.” -Attributed to Winston Churchill.

    For the last few decades, “off-shoring” (basing some of a company’s processes or services overseas, to take advantage of opportunities to lower costs), “vendor simplification”, and “just-in-time” (reducing stocks of raw-materials, work in progress, and finished goods within operating processes in order to free up working capital and improve cash-flow) have been basic strategic workhorses in the field of supply-chain management.

    However, one of the longer-term impacts of the recent pandemic will be a rethinking of the ways in which overseas supply lines and lean inventory practices open organizations of every size (from small businesses to entire nations) to risks of supply-chain failure, and consideration of re-shoring, on-shoring, and buffer options.

    For some companies, this strategic reassessment was already underway: The Kearney Reshoring Index, which measures global production strategies of US firms, shifted significantly in 2019, long before “novel coronavirus” became part of the standard lexicon, driven by changing US import policies and resulting trade-wars.

    Either way, many of our clients, across a surprising breadth of industries, are telling us that they underestimated the risks in their supply-chain. After experiencing business disruption due to shortages of the supplies and materials that they need to operate, they recognize that this may not be the result of the proverbial “black-swan” of the pandemic. Climate change, geo-political instability, growing social cause awareness, shifting regulatory environments, technology, and rapid and large swings in commodity prices are just some of the factors that now need to be considered.

    Such fundamental reevaluation is not straight-forward, and even knowing where to start can be intimidating, which is why Core Catalysts has a tried and tested Rapid Supply Chain Assessment ™ methodology that can be utilized to help you.

    We can pull together a team of professionals with deep industry-specific experience to help you identify and address critical supply-chain risks and issues, enhancing critical processes and increasing your supply-chain agility while managing lead-times, value-chain, and S&OP concerns across sourcing and procurement, operations / manufacturing, logistics / warehousing, and people, processes, systems, facilities, and assets / equipment, taking both short, medium, and long-term points of view, tailored to your specific needs.

    Specifically, we can help you:

    • Risk-assess and tier suppliers and vendors, and identify and enroll local options, and alternatives and contingencies for critical components, operations, and logistics routes
    • Model alternative demand / supply scenarios and their impact on capacity, revenue, profitability, and operations
    • Plan and execute transfers of production and service delivery assets and operations from offshore locations, or within the US
    • Review key supply-chain processes, including inbound, outbound, and tracking / tracing practices
    • Model the impact of changes to inventory positions, both financially and operationally, to identify and minimize the impact of safety stock / forward buying
    • Plan for reductions in range of offerings and reduce product / service complexity, while optimizing returns for all stakeholders
    • Formalize and streamline product / service allocation processes for constrained assets and supplies
    • Anticipate consumer, customer, and market changes
    • Identify public health and safety-critical issues
    • Ensure alignment and awareness upstream and downstream with your supply chain

    We execute each project with the end goal of generating value for your company in key areas including revenue and profitability, risk mitigation, service and quality management, and regulatory compliance. Deliverables can include benchmarking and performance goals relative to your industry, quick-win opportunities, and longer-term road maps and execution plans planning for performance enhancements, including capital and human resource considerations.

    The insights you will gain from a Core Catalysts Rapid Supply Chain Assessment ™ can help you determine where attention should be focused and to balance resiliency, cost, and efficiency priorities within your supply-chain to ensure your business continuity for the next “black-swan” event.

    If this sounds of interest to you, or you would like to find out more, just give us a call!

     

    Mark Jacobs, Client Service & Delivery